Retired
addition function problem (retired)
1,751 of 2,513Cyro
Loading description...
Fundamentals
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
Maybe its too easy to sum up 2 numbers. I suggest to put a variable number of arguments so you have to sum up all of them
.
I think this kata is too easy, need much more decription and harder task.
Not an issue
.
I think a little more of a description would be good. Also maybe make it just a tad harder. The test cases were very good.
too easy, needs a twist, even for an eight
Never type checks arguments
There is no point to this kata. It is too easy to be useful.
extremely simple
Reasonable for extreme beginners. As others pointed out, it's only useful for people learning syntax or programming for the first time.
This kata is basically pointless. The little "prove you know your language" thing that codewars does when you sign up us harder than this.
The name isn't even capitalized, the description is grossly lacking. This is an excercise in gross simplicity that doesn't teach anything.
Too easy
May be worth making it explicit that the parameters will always be ints (or passing strings to see if people are checking for type).
This kata is way too easy. There isn't any challenge.
As a beginner.. not impressed.. way too easy. And the instructions are too open. A lot of room for improvement this teaches nothing and I learnt nothing from it.
As it stands the current kata is way too easy. It needs some test cases that will make the user think and also needs to have a better description
For this to be any sort of challenge above very-beginner level, it needs a real challenge: something unexpected or weird that the warrior will have to deal with. In its current form, it is far too simple.
Since there is a bit more complicated test, for you to be able to join this community, i believe that this 'kata' has no place here, in its current form.
If you want to make it a little bit more interesting for the warriors, you can either disable the "+" symbol(not much of a challenge, but still- won't be THAT basic :D) or make the warriors add strings and lists too ;)
Way too easy. The instructions are unclear as well.
I find the wording in the kata description to be a bit confusing.
What should happen if Strings are passed in as parameters? If I do add("a", "b") then I would expect "ab" to return?
Too easy
I can improve this kata, just let me know if I am allowed to edit a bit :)
No problems.
not even a kata
This didn't have issues
more test
I think this is an insult.....too fucking easy!
And I think it's just a little modification in the most famous <A href"http://www.codewars.com/kata/50654ddff44f800200000004">multiply kata.
This comment has been hidden.
This just seems a little too easy. Maybe try adding some difficulty to it so individuals learn more out of it.
For example, try adding something like this as a test case:
a = 99 b = beers on a wall should return -> "99 beers on a wall"
Far too easy, i know for newbies the whole codewars experience can be a bit daunting to begin with, it was for me intially. But this test is far to simple. Could say want a function but not actually display the structure of one. Perhaps pad it out a little more.
Poor description
The description seems like a very weird way of saying 'add 2 numbers together'
Still too easy. Some solutions don't work anymore.
No enought tests. Returning fixed value passes tests.
edit No I see @anton-gorbikov reported this already
This comment has been hidden.
Lines start with capital letters.
I think I understand the point of this Kata, it's about figuring things by yourself. But: -too easy -purpose not explained
too easy
Like laoris said, it needs more test cases. I would also like there to be more functions to define such as subtraction or multiplacation.
This comment has been hidden.
What's this about?