Draft
Logical Conjunction
76 of 240justlemons
Loading description...
Logic
Mathematics
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
Aliasing a built-in is a worthless practice.
CoffeeScript translation Kumited! Please Accept :D
This comment has been hidden.
Suggestion
Some of the submitted results only check the first two operands, test cases should catch that (I don't know if this was fixed already).
Someone even checks if they are equal, causing
[false, false]to returntrue.Test cases are sadly lacking ..
I would have preferred to see the tests being simpler.
For instance, just having the tests passin a collection of true and falses may be better than having logic to determine whether a test case is true of false.
Since this is targeted at beginner programmers, this may make it easier for them without ditracting from the problem?
its not really clear what the input of the function will be
You should provide some test cases and better method signature. Also, I think some random tests would help.
Done and done. Thanks for the feedback.