Beta
Sharpen up
38 of 95tu6619
Loading description...
Fundamentals
Arrays
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
Ruby 3.0 should be enabled.
Enabled in this fork
This comment has been hidden.
Added in this fork
This comment has been hidden.
added.
This comment has been hidden.
Fixed.
Here's another issue:
The hash symbol (#) at the end of the last array element is causing a problem when submitting my solution to the server. It is probably being misinterpreted as part of the URL or something (my best guess). I painstakingly tested every line of my program to narrow it down to this, so I am sure it is this hash symbol that is causing the problem. Console.log confirms that I am arriving at the expected output; it just won't submit properly when I change "console.log" to a "return" statement.
A few considerations :
there are a bunch of solutions hence it is unlikely the kata is the problem
without your code posted it is impossible to know
without the error message, people are left to guess
Issues need details ... .
The described algorithm is incorrect for the key of F
['F#','C#','G#','D#','A#','E#']are not notes in the key of F
F has one flat Bb
Bb is also A#
sharps('F') should return
['A#']Kata's don't need to describe reality, they just need to propose problems (description updated).
Nice informative kata: ranked, upvoted, translated, if you want to approve both Ruby and Python translations :)
Thanks and nice work! All approved.
This comment has been hidden.
I like the creativity of the Kata! It's not the normal thing certainly but as a person who loves music I find this very inspiring.
thank you for your kind words!