8 kyu
I love you, a little , a lot, passionately ... not at all
1,316 of 56,049nbeck
Loading description...
Arrays
Fundamentals
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
definitely not for singles
So, what was your question?
Here's what I understand.
That a person starts counting the petals, for
nnumber of times.And if let's say
n = 8they start the counting froma littleand always start over witha littleand as like this should also be done for any number i.e.6n + 2, Right? And return last petal they stopped on, Right?For
n = 8the counting goes like this:And your function returns
"a little".I wouldn't say you start over with
a little, but that you end witha littleinstead. I already told you what start over means, after you reach "not at all", "I love you" comes next, and then "a little" and so on, as needed until you reach the nth phrase.Then what does this statement means?
"I love you", "a little", "a lot", "passionately", "madly", "not at all"original 6 elements, n goes from 1 to 6,"I love you", "a little", "a lot", "passionately", "madly", "not at all"the phrases start over at 7, n goes from 7 to 12,So on...
You're in the right track with what you thought in the first post, maybe it's a problem with how you describe it, but I think the idea is ok.
Well, ok because of the
start overI got confused and thought I had start over again and again on a specific position and was like why it's failing.Well it's done now.
The solution is a very cool concept with a lot of useful applications. However, it's confusing and more of a 7/6Kyu problem.
I don't think I'm understanding the question correctly?
The part where it says it should "start over", what does that mean?
That every time you reach "not at all", "I love you" comes next.
Oh, that's what I was missing, can you put an example there, in the instructions for this or somehow clarify this.
I can now see that this was obvious, but damn I jumped to the conclusion that it starts from a point and continues the same old loop.
hey, amigo, the verb )understand) does not take (ing)😂, i know it is not related to coding, but, you need to know it
What does it mean by so on? would 12 start on "not at all"? and would 13 start on "I love you"?
Yes.
Groovy Translation
Approved! In the meantime, can you edit all your past translations to adhere to the standard of this one? As it may get spammy to just post the same comment on them 1 by 1 ^^
About all of my past translations, should I use the old method of putting all of the tests into one single function for the Sample Test Cases? The reason why I'm thinking about it, is that the users could then easily add a new test if they want to.
This comment has been hidden.
hell yeeehhhhhhhh chlennn
This is the worst description of a kata I've ever read. Before coming up with a task, I would like to wish the author to formulate his thoughts correctly. I spent more time understanding the task than solving it
can anyone give me a hint to what should i do? does it have to use switch?
This is so far the worst kata description i have seen... didn't understand whatsoever what was the assignment.
mixed feelings about this one to be honest, it was fun but tedious
Wow these instructions were crap
you may offer, via the suggestion flag, your own improved version of the entire description if you wish. lo and behold, someone may then agree and adopt your efforts into the fold, thus improving the site.
so, young jedi, with great power comes great responsibilty, live long and prosper, this is the way
Intuitively, you would think that "I love you" is always in the phrase, so the rest of the phrase would say "I love you a little" or "I love you a lot" It took a while to figure out that the entire answer was just "a little" or "a lot" rather than "I love you a lot", etc. That part wasn't clear and took more time than necessary
a little math trick
The number of petals is not always greater than 0. I got a test case where the number of petals was infact 0.
Which language? If it is C#, doesn't seem possible with
int nb_petals = rnd.Next(1, 65536);1 is the lower bound.Okay I see. The problem was not that the nb_petals was 0, but that the calculations I was doing to petals was resulting in 0. Not a kata issue. Language was C#
I made a table for the different strings.
When the table was named "table" there was an error.
When the table was named "tablee" it worked.
Why is the table being named "table" a problem
Assuming you're using Lua,
tableseems to be a library for tables. You cannot use these as names for variables. See here: https://www.lua.org/pil/19.1.htmlThis comment has been hidden.
This comment has been hidden.
Description of kata is sucks
segfault
Your code segfaulting is not kata issue. See https://docs.codewars.com/training/troubleshooting/#post-discourse.
It's over
why does the test pass but the attempt throws an error? (С#)
RandomTests Test Failed Expected string length 5 but was 10. Strings differ at index 0. Expected: "madly" But was: "I love you" -----------^
Read that again. Your code returns
"I love you"for any number of petals greater than 6.I use switch / case with default, in my opinion any number not written in case falls into defaul and "I love you". When I click on the test button, everything works without errors.
Well, that's wrong and that's why it fails.
thanks mate, I re-read the assignment again and translated it. I understand my mistake. i'm going to crack my head on this
You're on the right track now, just some minor tweaks and your code will work.
did =) ty for help
I can solve 5-6 kyu, but this... too hard for me
It failed on iloveyou(r). what do I put for letters... I dont see it in the prompt
ris used in the random tests to store the random number that is parsed to the function. The function itself should never receive anything other than natural numbers as input.it`s too hard for 8kyu
This comment has been hidden.
This comment has been hidden.
This kata took a while to understand, but it is necessary part of great fundamentals. This is a great learning exercise for modular arithmetic and needs to be a part of the cirriculum for learning. Thank you.
Agree. Unfortunately Codewars is not a curriculum-based platform, but rather a training platform for amatuer coding skills.
Right, it would be helpful for amateur coders to be given this problem early on in their coding journey so they can learn how to apply modular arithmetic and why it is useful for certain problems. Please do not remove this kata in the future.
This comment has been hidden.
This comment has been hidden.
You need to start over each time. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 1, 2, 3, 4...
So much fun
The description just sucks! With 15 years of experience in php development, I did not understand what was meant here. So please add more test cases to make this kata easier to understand.
yes. this!
Is it better now?
Yep
Scala translation
Approved by someone
This comment has been hidden.
looool
expected:<[]> but was:<[a little]> . The printed error is in reverse. It should be expected:<[a little]> but was: <[]>.
This is for inputs higher than 6.
What language is this? Is it Java?
Fixed if it was Java, raise another issue otherwise, but stating the language this time.
This comment has been hidden.
Number 2 had me raging, please change it to this
This comment has been hidden.
That's the reason, not a kata issue.
fail test cases to see the desired answers and conditions? the description must be clear to try to solve it on the first try
This kata made my head hurt
This comment has been hidden.
what edits do you suggest?
What are the numbers of petals for the other sayings that in the desription? Or add more test cases to reflect that.
each time a petal is drawn
and there is already an example test with
n>6, so that should give you the necessary info to solve itSiddharth114's suggestion was what gave me my "ah-ha" moment. Thank you!!!
agreed. the response to your concern LITERALLY tells us nothing....
Lua translation ready for review :)
My sample tests pass but testing against the full test suite fails. any ideas why?
Hi, first of all welcome to Codewars;
It's impossible to say without more info, but the general answer to your question is: try to debug it yourself.
The most useful tool for you to do this is to print the input:
Read here about troubleshooting and printing the input
Since you are using Python, just write the following line of code:
print(nb_petals)Now when you run your tests, you will be able to see exactly which inputs are causing your program to fail - from here on, it's up to you to debug and try to solve the issues: maybe you aren't handling
0input correctly, maybe you aren't handling large values correctly, etc.Go sample tests:
Fixed there: https://www.codewars.com/kumite/6291211b58d87b18168c9a89?sel=629138d0b951dd7fd8b33249
Rust translation (author is inactive).
Look, I do see Myself as a fairly astute Man.. however, did You go to school in 1900?... because I have yet to hear of this old schoolyard game... Ok so, "I love you" refers to tnbe integer of 7, but frankly "Madly" in MY eyes refers to a more manic form of romance... so shouldn't that theoretically be the highest number?.. I already have a switch expression set up, however i am not sure as to which values to assign each case.. I do hope I have been clear about this matter
I mena no offense if I cam across in an abrasive manner by the way.
"not at all"should obviously be0, and therefore,"madly"should have the highest value, as you correctly inferred. however, despite your astuteness, you made a miscalculation: being the6th value of all the possibilities,"madly"should be attributed the numeric value of five (5), two less than you hypothesizedAh, I see, It is to be the value of all orher possibilties..... so I am assuming any vakue greater than the integer of value of 6 within the input field, is sort out any.. "beyond range" arguements?
If I made any error, please note that I an trying to type this responce at work between customers.
... oh wait... flash forward two days and more sleep... i messed up ...
This comment has been hidden.
Did anyone else get this error:
src/test/java/Test.java:2: error: Test is already defined in this compilation unit import org.junit.Test; ^ 1 error
No, copy your code, click reset, paste it and try again.
This comment has been hidden.
I've tried your code and although it's not correct, I don't get that error. Please mark your posts as having spoiler content next time.
I will, my bad
Java version sample tests err with my code, but full test suite passes. Java 8 shows two issues, Java 11 + - 1 issue (still, the sample test, did not work for me).
fixed
This comment has been hidden.
yeah, this should probably be 7 kyu, I dont think it is hard enough to be 6, but definitely 7
If you want easier kata you can sort the the 8kyus. They are normally sorted by newest. You can sort them by easiest or most completed to get easier katas
The problem is not in the complexity of the kata, but in the stupid description. Nothing is said about the fact that there can be more petals than sayings.
This comment has been hidden.
This comment has been hidden.
The description may be a bit difficult to understand for some, but your "improvement" would be plain wrong.
what did you suggest ?
So if Im lost on this problem how would I go about solving it? I see the solutions but they dont make total sense to me.
This comment has been hidden.
This comment has been hidden.
the descrioption of this kata is useless
I'm currently an 8kyu, so when I see higher kyus agreeing that this was too hard for 8kyus, I feel better. Anyone mind showing me how it's done?
This comment has been hidden.
I am unable to view the comment because it is flagged as a spoiler 😕
This comment has been hidden.
Thanks, here's a Fork to fix that.
Approved.
Extremly vague description of the problem
Felt a bit too hard for an 8ky
Personally disagree. It's slightly harder than most, but I feel like it fits in the 8 kyu category(besides, have you seen this).
// Testing number = 360, not at all
Ну да цветочек, с 282 лепесточками. Автор из Чернобыля?
// %6
Вся проблема в описании. Достаточно было бы сказать, что лепестков может быть больше, чем фраз.
Very useful but not an 8kyo
This comment has been hidden.
Definitely a bit too hard for the described level. Meandering and vague description left me almost completely lost and basically required me to unlock the solution. Would appreciate if these were vetted a bit more stricly to help new guys like me :)
I honestly feel the same way and its my first day. Its so overwhelming because what they are asking for is different from what the answer is. I dont know if im the only one?
Due to the strange description, I had to unlock the solution. Although it would be enough to say that there can be more petals than sayings.
COBOL translation.
This comment has been hidden.
Alright, I want to know where your school is xD.
Not a pertinent question.
bad description, totaly useless :)
idk what I'm suppose to use for this one in java. anyone know?
This comment has been hidden.
Please use spoiler flag next time.
The explanation for this Kata is terrible!
Julia translation
This comment has been hidden.
This comment has been hidden.
Please specify that the numbers can be > 6, and and will begin counting through again upon iterations of multiples of six.
Honestly I would not expect anyone to not know how this game works. But apparently I'd be wrong :)
sorry we are not privy to your inherent knowledge of flower games.
Very helpful comment, thank you.
thank you
Random tests sometimes put petals number equals to 0, however the description says the number of petals is greater than 0
Which language?
Typescript
Fixed.
thanks a lot!
Same problem with PHP
I see no fixed test for PHP with input value of
0and this doesn't seem to generate a0either:$n = rand(1, 1e6)are you sure about it?Description for this problem is not clear, how many flowers you can have more than 0 means every single positive,there is no restriction here.I Hope that you will give better explanation.
idk i test the code i pass the test, now when i press attempt the error i get is on the screenshot here https://prnt.sc/tbqrq1 really need some help
It's a problem with your code, read this
Click reset, the first sample test is different from what I see. The argument of the function can be greater than 6.
The description for this is far too vague. Spent more time working out what you wanted rather than actually writing the code.
Ruby The first test (Test.assert_equals(how_much_i_love_you(7),"I love you")) I get Expected: "I love you", instead got: nil
If I try my code in Rubymine I get "I love you" Any ideas?
You should probably mention there can be more than 6 petals.
added sometime ago (
nb_petals > 0)Python I keep getting this error Test.assert_equals(how_much_i_love_you(r), how_much_i_love_youPK(r)). Does this mean its trying to invoke the function with the parameter being r?
Not an issue, everything's working alright.
C++ -> 0 maps to "not at all" in the instructions it says nb_petals > 0. I think the instructions need to be updated. Your goal in this kata is to determine which phrase the girls would say for a flower of a given number of petals, where nb_petals > 0.
There're 1500+ completions in C++, and
0is never passed in as input. I'm not sure what you're talking about, but everything is working and described correctly.This comment has been hidden.
I would suggest giving an appropriate class name for the Java version, for example - class HowMuchILoveYou.test(int). If you have a local collection of your own kata solutions (for example all solved kyu8), it comes into conflict with other code challenges where an author has declared the same name.
resolving (seehere)
I don't get why 6 is related to 'not at all' while 7 is related to 'I love you'? Shouldn't 'not at all' be related to the last petal, i.e when there is only one petal left?
This comment has been hidden.
same thing, never played this game so I am finding a bit difficult to find the correct number of petals for this. And if you submit the first test is
random test too 227Which flower has 277 petals?well, just finished it, had to search how this game work, this is the correct order as in the description ['I love you', 'a little', 'a lot', 'passionately', 'madly', 'not at all'] From here you can figure out how to proceed
Typescript translation Enjoy!
cute!
I belive the random numbers test should be adjusted. Kata description says nb_petals > 0, but test generates 0 sometimes.
int n = rand.nextInt(100) + 0;
should be:
int n = rand.nextInt(99) + 1;
corrected (making it consistent with the python version).
This comment has been hidden.
They're not.
Thank you for your reply！You are right, actually I made a mistake.I used random number tests and I found nb = 11478, their results are different. Thanks again
C :
when nb_petals = 604, this error occurs:
The expression strcmp( how_much_i_love_you(randomValue), how_much_i_love_you_checker(randomValue) ) == 0 is false.
everything works fine except for that error. I don't understand why!
C++:
If I use 'case' then I see this error:
main.cpp:17:50: error: function definition is not allowed here std::string how_much_i_love_youPK(int nb_petals) {
main.cpp:23:50: error: function definition is not allowed here void testequal(std::string ans, std::string sol) {
main.cpp:28:1: error: function definition is not allowed here {
main.cpp:47:21: error: use of undeclared identifier 'how_much_i_love_youPK'; did you mean 'how_much_i_love_you'? dotest(r, how_much_i_love_youPK(r) ); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ how_much_i_love_you
main.cpp:6:13: note: 'how_much_i_love_you' declared here std::string how_much_i_love_you(int nb_petals) {
main.cpp:47:11: error: use of undeclared identifier 'dotest' dotest(r, how_much_i_love_youPK(r) );
main.cpp:53:40: error: function definition is not allowed here int main(int argc, const char *argv[]) {
main.cpp:59:2: error: expected '}' }
main.cpp:6:48: note: to match this '{' std::string how_much_i_love_you(int nb_petals) {
7 errors generated.
Compiler errors in your code are not issues in the kata.
If you want feedback on your code you can post it (using markdown) here and flag it with a spoiler.
This comment has been hidden.
Confused. I have written two versions of code but while testing I got the error "unsupported operand type for list and int". Then I just tried to copy similar solution from solutions page, using:
return tears[(petals % len(tears) -1]
and I get the same error.
What can be the reason?
Thank you.
Isn't petals a list there? You can't use modulo operator between a list and an int. You also missed a
)there.This comment has been hidden.
That code isn't ok, the error message is explicit about what's wrong there, this is the original code:
where
nb_petalsis a number, I don't know why you use()in tears there, if you want to declare a list, use[]If you want to use%both operands must be numbers. I can only guess that petals is a list there (given the error message).This comment has been hidden.
In Python: A list uses square brackets
[1, 2, 3]When you use parentheses, that's a tuple(1, 2, 3)You can read more here You don't need the parentheses around petals in the return line.Thank you!
Your tests are in the wrong format:
org.junit.Assert.assertEquals("expected", "actual");. You have this the other way around.Fixed that and Sample tests didn't work either, fixed that too.
Test cases for java are broken. This can be fixed by simply renaming public class "Test" to anything other than "Test".
Done.
I had fun solving the kata. I think it would be cooler if it would ask for the whole result sentence. For example for 9 petals it should result in "I love you a little". Ofcourse it would make it somewhat harder so maybe this was an intentional choice. THanks for creating it anyway.
This comment has been hidden.
That isn't an issue, it is a question.
The fixed tests often don't cover the entire range of output. Take your program and manually trace out the outputs it produces from 1-12 and see if it matches as it should.
Sample Tests cannot be compiled as they are. Plus there is a test for number of petals = 0, when the problem clearly states that we should expect the number to always be positive. And, this test case complete changes how the problem is solved.
There are a dozen languages, please specify the language so issue(s) can be fixed.
This kata is having several problems:
Sample Tests are showing build failure because of "Test cannot be converted to Annotation" (even import statement is correct)
Attempt Tests are having incorrect assert statements for values > 7 "expected<[]> but was: <[I love you]> (even my result is empty)
Fixed.
My test are passing, but I keep getting "Process exited prematurely with a SIGILL signal". Anyone know why?
I have the same issue
C# translation Kumited. Please review it and approve if you give the all clear.
When I make an attempt in Java I pass first test but fail random: Test Results: test1(SidTest) Test Passed testRandomValues(SidTest) Log Testing number = 94, passionately Testing number = 85, I love you Testing number = 23, madly Testing number = 95, madly Testing number = 64, passionately Testing number = 42, not at all expected:<null> but was:<not at all>
It makes no sense, why expected 'null' in 42? It should be "not at all".
The expected and actual solutions are swapped around. So your code is returning null but the expected answer is "not at all". This is proven by:
This shows that even though "I love you" is hardcoded, it says the actual was "a lot".
@nbeckcan you swap the testcases' actual and expected in Java.thank you for your reply @AcesOfGlory, it is very helpful
This comment has been hidden.
You need to return your output; returning the value means the value is retained from that function call. The value retained can be checked and checked for equality against the expected answer. You are attempting to modify to the HTML on the page, which can only be check locally, not globally.
All katas on this website work like this.
Im still a little confused. I cant return document.write unless I'm mistaken, and returning nbPetals doesnt fix the qualm
Im not quite sure about the HTML interaction comment. This is in Javascript, interacting with HTML?
Thank you very much for the comment and all help thus far
Do
return "madly"instead ofdocument.write("madly")and etc.JavaScript interacts with HTML directly via DOM. Document.write() works on HTML pages because it writes the string to the document body.
Functions should act like mathematical function in which an input is given, then a set procedure is processed, then an output is produced. You implemented a 'procedure' where each function block acts out a task but nothing is returned at the end of the function. Ideally you should create function and then use procedures to gather the result of functions and map their output accordingly.
As for your code: you need to consider what will happen when
nbPetals> 6. Your code only includes inputs 1-6, but your code needs to be iteratively so that it can find the remainder (the output) when all the petals are removed.This comment has been hidden.
The code should be:
(it lacks one import and the name of the class is wrong)
Neither test nor attempt works under java now. switching unit tests to Blind4Basics version doesn't do a thing
same for me
public class Test { // need to rename, as example Test2
@Test public void testMethod() ... }
Fixed.
This comment has been hidden.
When you take the modulus of a number, there is going to be a case when the return value is equal to zero. For example, 0 modulo 6 is 0. As well, 6 modulo 6 is also 0. Any mulitple of 6 will return a modulo of zero, thus you have to check for that case. The cases you hightlighted above, however extend from 1 through 6. You are off by a factor of 1. Shift everything down, so have a case zero through case 5. Case 6 will never occur from what I see.
This comment has been hidden.
This comment has been hidden.
Not sure what this error means:
Failed asserting that two strings are equal. Expected: 'I love you' Actual : 'a lot'
Code below... Any ideas?
function how_much_i_love_you(int $nb_petals): string { $last_petal = array(0 => "I love you", 1 => "a lot", 2 =>"not at all"); $outcome = $nb_petals % 3; return $last_petal[$outcome]; }
This comment has been hidden.
I think it will fail with nb_petals = 8 (it should be returning "a little" instead of "passionately") Good luck.
Haskell translation kumited. Please review and approve. Thanks, suic
PHP Translation Kumited - please accept :D
Done
This comment has been hidden.
The description for this Kata is absolutely awful and is completely nonsensical, it makes an otherwise easy task into something that you spend more time figuring out than actually solving...
Open to any suggestion to improve the description.It's a girly kids game, if you know this one the kata is easy. And already 274 persons was able to solved it!
I am not a native speaker, yet I managed to fully understand it without a problem, but ok: care to give a more positive and constructive feed, like how you would re-word it?
This comment has been hidden.
Done, according to your description.
So all the basic tests pass, but not the suite. The
outputtells menbPetals 142 ✘ Expected: 'passionately', instead got: 'undefined'I'm I suppose to randomly guess the number? I don't understand. I'm confused.Thanks in advance.
Can you put your code here and specify that is a spoiler, in this why I will be able to help you.
This comment has been hidden.
Think to this kata as an iterative process, you take one petal after other and start again.
So you will have: I love you, not at all, madly, passionately, a lot, a little, I love you, not at all.... and so on.
Maybe this way is clearer for you if not let me know :) .
It clarifies things a bit, let me try something.
Just unflag this one :)
This comment has been hidden.
You just enter one time in your for loop... because you return immediatly with the first reaction!
That's explain why you always got "I love you"
Thanks man I'm still having problems with this, but I'll figure it out. It's upsetting though. Thanks for the hints
C Translation :)
I have a solution that works in LinqPad but causes an excption when tested in CodeWars. As an F# beginner I don't know whether it is something I'm doing or something broken in the F# test harnest.
at Microsoft.FSharp.Collections.SeqModule.Item[T] (System.Int32 index, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable
1[T] source) [0x00030] in <55c32c755d9f56a7a7450383752cc355>:0 at FSI_0002.howMuchILoveYou (System.Int32 nbPetals) [0x00053] in <dd96d4ac9a8b4cd4bab8d00ce83f887c>:0 at FSI_0002+Tests+suite@12.Invoke (Microsoft.FSharp.Core.Unit _arg1) [0x00035] in <dd96d4ac9a8b4cd4bab8d00ce83f887c>:0 at Fuchu.Impl+evalTestList@260-1.Invoke (System.Tuple2[T1,T2] tupledArg) [0x00028] in <56a815db36d21f70a7450383db15a856>:0@g964 Have you any idea ?
It says the same to me when I tried to submit my F# solution. I'm also a beginner and don't know if it's me or the F# test suit.
No idea what this kata is talking about.
Take a look at the test case it can help. It was a game when I was kids. Read the Discourses discution it can help too.
This comment has been hidden.
It's a girl's game. You basically "decide" your fate based on the number of petals of a flower that you tear apart one by one... And by fate I mean if you like someone or not. lol =)
I have absolutely no clue what these instructions mean!
I dont understand the instructions, any help!
One hint: The three static testcases show what to do;-)...
This comment has been hidden.
Yes, you are right;-)...
Crystal translation kumited.
Ahah I like your testing method !
Thanks and take some of my katas:-)
The instructions don't say what to do in case the nb_petal > 0. My solution passes the basic tests but fails the extended test since my dictionary has no key for 0.
This comment has been hidden.
You mean : what to say if the number of petals is 0 ?
This comment has been hidden.
This comment has been hidden.
Upvoted! Python translation kumited. Could you approve it please?
Done, thanks.
Thanks! I think you should replace the last sentence of the description by something like this: "Your goal in this kata is to define the result of such a game given nb_petals
> 0, the number of petals torn."JS translation kumited.
I´m not able to accept this one some issue with the server :(. I wil retry latter.
JS fork done. Hope all is well:-)
Done, thanks.
Coffeescript translation kumited: https://www.codewars.com/kata/i-love-you-a-little-a-lot-passionately-dot-dot-dot-not-at-all/translations
Accepted!
Fsharp translation kumited and maybe I will be done for today:-)
You are some kind of crazy! Tnaks a lot. I better understand your score in the translating part!
Usually I translate my own katas but I found your idea funny:-)
I think we have the same kind of reference here.
Thanks.