Retired
Credit Card or Playing Card (retired)
Loading description...
Artificial Intelligence
Arrays
Strings
Algorithms
Puzzles
View
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
This comment has been hidden.
I would suggest adding a lot more test cases. Now it's just guessing which words are going to be in, and hardcoding them. If you have hundreds of test case, that isnt possible anymore.
Let's just say that the execution of this kata's idea is probably never gonna be good at all.
Just side not (not a criticism). I tried solving this kata using few different data-mining approaches (used for "text-mining") and I could only get up to "Your percentage: 56.666666666666664".
Edit: this is normal because of small training data set.
@dpleshkov,This is a nonsensical statement and all it does it encourage other people to add it to their own kata descriptions and then ignore the issue. Duplicate katas are always issues and writing/approving them goes against the Codewars Kata Best Practices.
Hopefully you will remove this statement from any of your authored katas that have it.
Thanks!
I think you mentioned this in one of my other katas.
@dpleshkov,Yes, I did mention the same thing on another one of your katas. That's partly why I was surprised to see the same message on this kata when I came across it earlier.
Thanks for removing that sentence!
This comment has been hidden.
This comment has been hidden.
This comment has been hidden.
Ok, good work, it still feels like one has to simply guess keywords though. Maybe that's fine, but you could consider using something like % similarity between strings or semantic similarity instead, although that might be a different kata entirely I guess