6 kyu
Infinite Diceworks: MeanMaxing your rolls
36 of 113Voile
Loading description...
Mathematics
Dynamic Programming
Recursion
Probability
Statistics
Puzzles
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
Very nice kata to practice with, congratulations, thanks a lot.
I believe it would be more valuable to comment on a kata only when you have something meaningful to contribute to the discussion. Since all katas are approved, they're already considered 'nice'.
Is there a comment restriction or should we all be autistic? Thanks for being demorilizing as usual, no surprise.
I guess you're afraid I'm going to beat you too soon man, so please let me leave a feedback to the katas I complete, it's my solemn right, thanks.
I already have too many problems with you people.
It's insulting that people cannot speak or at least say what they think on this platform.
You made your point. Furthermore, there is nothing wrong with your initial comment.
Thanks, at least somebody out there, I want to keep the competition clean, sometimes authors even thank me, you know? I appreciate that honestly, if it sounds disturbing let me know, I think these place needs more intelligent content.
I also speak my opinion on some kata's, either really good or really bad ones. Noone should feel afraid of doing so.
I do this sometimes as well, but commenting on every kata you just solved can feel like saying, "Hey everyone, look, I've solved this kata."
So what?
Why 3 case doesn't contain (2,2), (2,1), (1,2)?
The maximum roll in all these 3 cases are 2.
This comment has been hidden.
I completely agree with the poster below. This kata's desciption is wordy where it shouldn't be wordy, and not wordy enough where there is a lack of information.
I suggest changing "mean" to "expectancy". We talk about the "mean" of given values. We talk about the "expectancy" of a random variable (like a dice roll or a maximum of dice rolls as given here)
Approved ;-) Python translation
The test message shouldn't be overridden, the 3rd argument is supposed to be the threshold ;-)
Apparently the 3rd argument in
Test.assertApproxEqualsis not the threshold value. I'll fix the JS version.Fixed Python. I told it to do what JS did ;-)
edit: wait a seconddoneApproved ;-)
only node 6? :/
Old kata syndrome ;-)
Added Node 8
Isn't the plural
dice?(Finally) fixed