Draft
Run-length Encoding
Loading description...
Strings
View
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
Duplicate.
In addition to adding sample test cases, you should add some random tests to the main test suite to keep people from just submitting special case solutions for the fixed inputs.
Also, adding a variant for Swift 4 would be very welcome.
You have no sample tests at the moment, all you have is the default test that always passes if the submitted code compiles. You should really add your current test cases to the sample tests so people attempting the problem have something to work with (though you may want to save the empty input string for the hidden tests).