Beta
Implement Classes by using Functions
Loading description...
Metaprogramming
Puzzles
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
There are a lot of restrictions that should be applied so user code won't just use Python classes to implement said class system. At least the user should not be able to
eval/execCurrent tests are unacceptable, as none of the tests provide meaningful feedback message, and they behave like
test.expect.Oh yeah, there are no random tests either. The tests are also very weak, so it is not very hard to just pass the tests without implementation a correct solution.
author has had five years to open a window to let the haze out, proof read, and get to the point. surely this should get retired, this isn't what a published piece of text should read like.
Am I the only one not seeing any sort of specifications in the description? What am I even trying to do?
the hell is this
Python 3.8 should be enabled.
kata broken (python) by the new runner. Need corrections
Done
:+1:
errrr... Why is there this comment in the initial solution?
x)