6 kyu
Mnemonic Lookup
Loading description...
Fundamentals
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
This comment has been hidden.
Codes blocks in the description are broken. Needs an update.
Codeblock fixed
Great kata, well done, Sensei Ania!
Why does the third example test expect
"You're onto something, but still quite far off."? The instructions specifically say, "If the [Group] does exist (eg: rainbow) but does not include the [Word] as a key (eg: rainbow does not include the key rose) then return a string:“There is no mnemonic for this”."There is a mistake on the instructions, it should say: "If the [Group] does exist (eg: rainbow) but does not include the [Word] as a key (eg: rainbow does not include the key rose) then return a string:
"You're onto something, but still quite far off."." Voile or AniaMakes could fix it.Agh, I edited the description (just the other day) per someone else's recommendation and didn't spot that! Fixed.
Approved
We should probably improve the description before approving this kata.
"Puzzles" flag...;-)
I'm curious why this would classify as a puzzle - I thought it would be pretty simple fetch-info-from-object kata...
Amended the description - hopefully to make it better.
One important point is/was unclear (perhaps only for me;-)?)... but made it a little bit more interesting and the code perhaps a little bit "strange":-)... So i have no comment to change something;-)...
I think it was that same important point that gave me pause there for a moment - and then I figured it out. I wouldn't suggest changing it. :]