7 kyu
Computer Science 101 - #3 Deques
169 of 174donaldsebleung
Loading description...
Performance
Fundamentals
Tutorials
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
great series of katas! thank you!
My only complaint is this is 7 kyu while this is 6 https://www.codewars.com/kata/58901ac726bd581274000096 maybe they should swap xD
One of the kata in "Regarding Duplication" is retired, so references to it can be removed. Since this kata is approved already the entire "Regarding Duplication" could be removed if you want.
Description has : "pop front - Remove an item to the back of the deque (and return it)."
this should be
"pop front - Remove an item from the front of the deque (and return it)."
corrected
Implementing a Deque ADT with pointers is only 7 Kyu? That can't be right.
Just finished the three in this series. Great job! I hope you find the time to keep going with this series!
Translators' Note->Translator's NoteThank you for the suggestion but "Translators' Note" is correct English usage assuming more than one translator - see Rule 2a of this page.
Then you need to go fix the other two katas: they have
Translator's Note.Noted; thanks for informing :)