Retired
LargeNumber*Digit (retired)
Loading description...
Fundamentals
Algebra
Mathematics
Algorithms
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
This is free using any BigInteger type.
Why don't you block access to biginteger? Your kata will be much more interesting.
is a good idea, but how can I do that?
Well...i'm not creating Kata's at all. I suppose that inside the body of your testing you can apply a method to control the type of variable. I'm just guessing so i can be wrong.
Issues:
MultiplicationRegards,
suic
fixed.