Beta
Grouping distinct items
88haroen
Loading description...
Arrays
Fundamentals
View
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
Duplicate, as pointed in the comment below.
Duplicate of groupBy. Not word for word, but the concept isn't novel.
Or is it different enough?
this one can be done by grouping by equality or with the ids, which makes it different, but I understand the similarity.
But is it different enough ?
The criterion isn't "is it different?" but "is the concept novel?"
Heck, they are a nice pair; I'm just gonna link yours from mine.
.
So what's the idea?.. Now grouping by a given key works as well as grouping by id reset.
This is an idea I had from something I did at work, I used the numbered id, a colleague used the key, so thought to leave both possibilities as an option to the reader here
Good call, I forgot to add that constraint in the tests! Will fix
Categories are unique in the random tests now