Retired
Create a pyramid (retired)
Loading description...
Fundamentals
Strings
Data Types
View
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
Why status of this kata is "retired"?
It's a duplicate of many existing katas.
Fixed tests should not rely on the reference solution.
fixed
Nothing was fixed.
The reference solution is wrong.
fixed
Example test correct, actual tests wrong
Re-raised with more useful info.
Morever, full test suite is inconsistent with the description.
Two different output for same input is expected.
Re-raised with more useful info.
Should use new test framework and python 3.8 enabled
How do I enable 3.8 and 3.6 at the same time? If I import codewars_test, the test won't work for 3.6 anymore. This is my first kata, sorry if im a noob at this
use
testnotTest. Anyways, fixed, but not using new test frameworkfixed
Almost duplicate of:
https://www.codewars.com/kata/52755006cc238fcae70000ed
https://www.codewars.com/kata/5a405ba4e1ce0e1d7800012e
There're many similar formatting katas, there's probably an identical kata already available.