Retired
Matrix Pooling (retired)
11cemsina
Loading description...
Algorithms
Performance
Matrix
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
The image in the description is wrong.
fixed
It's not mentioned which tuple elements refers to the number of kernel rows/columns.
fixed
If your intention is to make naive approaches fail, then:
a) you need to mention input sizes, etc in the description
b) you need to increase tests slightly. My posted solution often fails, but occasionally passes, and it is about as straightforward as it gets.
I don't know what is novel about this. This is just using numpy methods or nested for loops in pure python, right?
Yep