You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.×
Retired
Find the Majority Digit in a number (retired)
Loading description...
Algorithms
Fundamentals
Logic
Arithmetic
Mathematics
Numbers
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
Counting digits in a number has been done before. https://www.codewars.com/kata/60dbc94243ca68000d2d191c/java
i dont think that this kata is the same with https://www.codewars.com/kata/60dbc94243ca68000d2d191c/java
It may not be exactly the same, but there are many katas doing this kind of stuff with some variation. I advice you to read carefully the content authoring guidelines before publishing new katas: https://docs.codewars.com/authoring/guidelines/
There are more than 7000 katas currently available on CodeWars. It's really getting hard to find out novel ideas, particularly with tasks implying only basic things like parsing, comparing, sorting, reducing...
These are two other similar katas:
Thank you for your reply, i will try better next time.
Random tests always expect
false.This is issue is resolved