Beta
Generate JSFuck Program
Loading description...
Strings
Esoteric Languages
Algorithms
View
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
I enjoyed doing the kata ( I'm a bit of a masochist .. ), and I did get some help from the obvious place.
What I did not enjoy was discovering you just stole the entire example solution from the obvious place.
If you want to make this kata, do not just steal the necessary solution, actually solve it yourself first. You have my downvote for that, not because I think the kata is bad.
This comment has been hidden.
Thanks for the feedback. I'm glad you liked it.
This comment has been hidden.
What's stopping people from just copying the implementation from internet?
Codewars is a platform where you can solve tasks, of course you can copy the solution of a problem from the Internet, but this will not be correct.
"correct" may not be the correct word here. It's not the intended way of solving, but of course it can be a correct solution. H3ll, retrieving the solution from the Internet in real time can be a correct solution.
( Almost ) every other problem on CW can be solved this way. Why is this now suddenly an
Issue
for this kata?It was concensus a long time ago that if you publish a kata that involves a task with many existing, exact solutions around, the kata is not novel and it should be seriously reconsidered. Since when are we defending for this instead? I thought beta process isn't suppose to become more degenerate over time.
(Yes, I know you're disagreeing because it was me who raised the issue. Given it's someone else you'd not react the same way. That doesn't mean I have to care. Especially if you aren't planning to.)
I'm not being defensive, I'm just trying to figure out how to improve this kata. You can solve this kata in different ways, I don't think there is any exact solution. Well, or if we generalize this idea a bit, then each problem leads to some kind of exact solution.
And I don’t think that the presence of a solution somewhere on the Internet somehow interferes with kata. The purpose of the kata is to introduce the user to the problem and to try to solve it.
I don't think this is an
Issue
, since the solution to any kata can be found on the Internet.This comment has been hidden.
I partly agree with you, but I can't immediately give a rating, if people decide that the kata is easy, then they can put a low rating.
It seems to me that I still do not fully understand the problem. Is the problem that the solution to this problem can be found on the Internet or that it is not very difficult?
Well, that wouldn't be fair.
rather something along the line of: "not easy while a solution already exists and it makes the kata deceptively easy in comparison to the actual task"