6 kyu
Merging Two Channels
130BattleRattle
Loading description...
Concurrency
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
why
println(len(a), cap(a))on both a and b on second and third default tests giving0, 0?Golang
This comment has been hidden.
I guess, it depends on the way you solve the problem. Usually having to deal with two fixed things is easier to implement than dealing with any amount of things.
But when I look at your submissions, I can see what you're referring to. I'm undecided, I personally would think, it still makes sense to have both katas 🤔
I've decided for myself to keep both for mentioned reason
This kata serves as a good warm-up for the other one. Many solutions vary significantly, and the ratings are quite high. Completing the other kata first makes this one much easier, but the reverse isn't necessarily true. Couldn't approve at 7, so I picked 6.