Retired
Learn split and sep method (retired)
Loading description...
Fundamentals
Strings
Logic
Puzzles
View
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
cheers
Hi! I'm trying to write a kata for beginners. When I started doing tasks, then kata in the likeness of such would be interesting.
yeah, sure. But the "problem" might be that the kata, as soon as it's published, becomes part of the public database and is subject to reviews from other users of the community. So if the community doesn't like the kata, well, it might become a somewhat unpleasant experience for you (for a reason or another).
Did you get pointed to the documentation about authoring already? Apparently not, since the kata is still not on par with the minimal requirements.
It's totally fine if you're just poking around to see how it works, but in that case, just don't expect to cross path with "happy beta testers". ;)
Thanks for the answer. You are right. I still need to learning to write kata
Hi,
Why did you try again? The feedback was pretty clear with the one of yesterday, tho, wasn't it?
Cheers