Beta
Escape the Matrix (Memory Edition)
Loading description...
Puzzles
.avif)
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
At least, in C++, could use a callable that someone would modify (function pointer or std::function<> of some sort). Nice idea for a hakathon, IMHO bad idea for this codesite. Note: Had the ability to edit: should have delete :-(
Also, you gotta fix the simplest cheese like this
Should be fixed now. Can you please validate.
With zero information given (not even the implementation of
tryEscape, or any tags, or anything?), this kata is not a good puzzle.In fact, author solution is doing the equivalent of cheating, so this is not a good idea for a kata either.
It was my intention to not give the implementation of tryEscape() so the users have to find the implementation by themselves by dumping the memory. I will add tags soon.
And the solution which I did is my intended solution. Other katas do the same thing like https://www.codewars.com/kata/54bd6b4c956834c9870001a1/
I added tags
meaning it's a duplicate?
No it is not. Other katas are also split because the puzzle type is the same but the solution is different.
This kata uses a unique (I hope) solution.
Take these two for example:
https://www.codewars.com/kata/5510caecaacf801f820002ac
https://www.codewars.com/kata/54bd6b4c956834c9870001a1