6 kyu
Insights for Online Store Product Variants
181bornForThis
Loading description...
SQL
Databases
.avif)
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
In random tests, I get both total_unique_variants and in_stock_variants wrong from time to time, while sample tests are passing.
your solution is correct and now is passing the tests. I fixed the tests to prevent generation of the same combinations with different
in_stockoptiongreat, it works now!
Sometimes random tests generate products with the same variant but different
in_stock, and expect both to be counted insidetotal_unique_variants.updated tests to prevent this from happening. thank you for the feedback!