Beta
Hamming Distance in Braille
Loading description...
Algorithms
Strings
View
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
I'm really enjoying this kata! It's interesting and unique. It has multiple levels of discovery for the uninitiated to a) braille unicode (cool!) b) Hamming distance (also cool!). However, I got bogged sown on the ligatures and text parsing. I think this kata could be split into two. The easy version without ligatures, then a harder version with ligatures. Really love this concept and very fun to grapple with, but will have to come back later to aolve as the ligatures are throwijg me for a loop. Without them i'd have solved already with "very" satisfied rating.
came back and finished. rated "very". thank you for such a fun and interesting kata!
Tests are missing the following explicit imports:
fixed! Thanks for letting me know :)
Maybe add an explicit
from preloaded import braille
to the solution setup? I think it's the technically more idiomatic way to use the runner.For now i just copied it to the test cases.
No, I meant to add an explicit import for the users convenience so that they can't miss it.
done!
This comment has been hidden.
fixed! Thx :)