Hi Guys,

Thank you both for spending your time on providing a more clear explanation.
@awesomead - the code was indeed buggy. I'm currently learning to code in RUST and things are much more different than with other languages (in a positive way, I'd say).

P.S. - Once I submitted a working variant of my code and saw the solutions of other people - I realized how much more there is to learn. The positive thing here is that I already received some feedback about the fact that very often "clever" solutions are much more difficult to debug in the future... I gues that depending on the point of view - there might actually be some positives to writing without too much of syntactic sugar.

Enjoy the rest of the day / week.

Cheers,

Hi Guys,

Can someone please help me?

I've written the code that solves the kata in RUST (I tested it manually with different number combos), but when I "Attempt" the kata officially >>> I get the following result(s):

=============================================================

tests::test_big
assertion failed: (left == right)
left: 3021499,
right: 31499
tests::test_random
called Result::unwrap() on an Err value: ParseIntError { kind: PosOverflow } at src/lib.rs:53:43
tests::test_real
assertion failed: (left == right)
left: 3,
right: 13
tests::test_silly
Test Passed

I checked the tests which the creator has made, and it seems that he / she / they are testing 2 different functions:

• one that solves the kata using normal multiplication;
• one that solves the kata using the puzzle from the kata;

Here is what I mean:

#[test]
fn test_real_add() {
assert_eq!(add(2, 11), 13);
assert_eq!(add(0, 1), 1);
assert_eq!(add(0, 0), 0);
}

#[test]
fn test_silly_add() {
assert_eq!(add(16, 18), 214);
assert_eq!(add(26, 39), 515);
assert_eq!(add(122, 81), 1103);
}

Hi,

I have the same question as Alexander.

The wording used in the "Deatils" states >> "a boolean true if ALL rotations of strng are included in arr (C returns 1)"

How comes a string which contains only 4 of the possible rotations gives us a result of: true? :(

Regards,