I agree. chrono and blind4basics could you kindly comment there :)

let's do this there rather than here...

I see them like this:

The expression (get_sum(5 , -1)) == (14) is false.

And in the randomized tests I see this:

The expression (get_sum(C, X)) == (your solution code here) is false.

Like the expressions aren't evaluated at all, and literally shown.

blind4basics I didn't change the description ?

It throws an error.

Try returning some value like 1, and click Attempt.

What do you mean ? How does it give code away ?

@anonymous: if you correct the description, I can try x)

(some code blocks are wrong)

Blind4Basics, could you possibly review and approve this. If it allows you to approve it, It means power users can approve it, otherwise...

@michaelkelner:

you should be able to remove "your" comments, as long as nobody answered to them (not sure the downvotes will allo it, though. Just try it)

Sie sollten in der Lage sein, "Ihre" Kommentare zu entfernen, solange niemand auf sie geantwortet hat (nicht sicher, ob die Downvotes dies zulassen werden. Versuchen Sie es einfach)

@Chrono: maybe an admin? idk. Or maybe you're right! x)

B4B, I mean, he posted 2 translations barely 1 day ago (C++ and Java) and the two were approved, if not the author, who approved them?

Also blind4Basics : following you :)

Sprichst du Englisch ?

10,000 honor. Then i'm assuming it includes you as well ?

yes it does. ;)

@Chrono: nope, there is a 7 day delay between the publication and possible approval by a power user anyway (as far as I know, at least). EDIT: wait, I believe I misunderstood what you said. Could you be more specific?