this cheat from chatGPT !!
or super clever

Hey I learned this today too! 3 years later though...

new test framework should be used (python 3.8 enabled)

Actually, there is no unnecessary computation here. min(numbers) is simply repeated both in the if and else conditions. Only one of them gets executed, though.

Yes, it does. I mark it as resolved.

There was indeed a bug. Please, check that it works now.

Python: sometimes in random tests None is expected, but if I print the dict and the target value (print(d, target)), the value is actually in one of the lists. Some examples:

Log
{'jiqhozzbwf': [547, 845, 29], 'arzkmizkpc': [438], 'rtfqoijs': [282, 935, 535, 375, 368, 408, 798, 748, 332, 273]} 748
'rtfqoijs' should equal None

Log
{'ssqjocbs': [242, 345, 930], 'tpyrqjvqz': [708, 416, 670, 350, 616, 40, 964, 238, 370, 380], 'phwla': [374, 134, 655, 987, 389, 584, 896, 369]} 987
'phwla' should equal None

Well Done!

Sorry, I put it there to check the case and I forgot to remove it! It's been removed now.

Tests should not log cryptic stuff.

The individual letters of the input should have random case -> done, please approve forked version

May I have a detailed explanation of why this was rejected? Otherwise I cannot learn from my mistakes...