Not only are you trying to be pedantic, but you also don't even seem to understand the rule you're trying to be pedantic about.
That method does accept two parameters, since two is in the range of 0..N. The opposite of accept is reject, and if that function rejected
two parameters, the tests would not pass.

Also, why are you criticizing people for improving the function by not limiting the amount of names a person can have? At least hundreds of millions of people in the world have more than two names.

This is pedantic but the description does say:

Create a function ... that accepts two parameters

Although the test cases doesn't test for the amount of parameters, this solution would technically be incorrect as it accepts 0 to N parameters.

I Don't know ... pff

I really don't understand why "gaslighting" is offensive. Yes, Trump was accuesed of "gaslighting" but you could just as easily have said he was "fooling" or "misleading" them. I can, however, understand that it is somewhat less clear (being a term from a vintage movie).

Approved!

C Translation

The question is asking you to get responded to.

Johan, let me start by saying I understand your concern. Our core goal is to make Codewars an enjoyable place for all developers of any background to spend their time. Gaslighting is a term that has some negative connotations so I made the suggestion to change the description to mislead/fool as both are more accurate and accessible terms. My suggestion to change the title was to add a greater sense of curiosity to the kata on the search page, which I hope in turn would bring more users to MelonFruit's challenge.