No problem but I won't add it to the basic tests. Not only would you need a large leaderboard, but you can't account for every possible mistake and put it in the basic tests.

Yep got it thank you. I guess it would be a good idea to add this kind of case to the basic tests. Cheers!

That is not what I was talking about. As you have probably seen already, your code works for smaller leaderboards but not for larger ones. This is due to you not accounting for large changes.

Can't really see the mistake. I assume you talk about the fact that in name there is a +a and in score -a - this is deliberate. Still i cannot understand the problem :/. Can you give me an example in which this code would not work? Cheers.

The tests for javascript are not correct

Sorry for accusing you of that. :P Problem may have been that the reference solution was modifying its input.

Hiljusti, if you could read over my fork carefully and see if I fixed all issues and didn't introduce any new ones, that would be useful.

Ha, that was the first thing I checked. No, I wasn't. Code passes now with your new translation. Thanks for doing that.

Is this issue resolved now that JohanWiltink has updated the javascript translation?

Thank you very much for doing that.

You were modifying the input, weren't you? :]