Fixed

Marked issue as resolved

Hi. Thanks. Yes I'm absolutely sure there's no problem with it, I have only removed the declaration of an unused variable :)

Thanks😊

4 years later, issue is still not solved ^^

Fixed.

plunit_persistence:prod_/2: Undefined procedure: plunit_persistence:prod/2 (forall bindings = [1])

Thanks for the translation!

Same issue here. Please fix the JavaScript checker.

It's easy to check it's failing:

function packBagpack(scores, weights, capacity) {
  let totalWeight = weights.reduce((p, c) => p + c, 0),
      totalScore = scores.reduce((p, c) => p + c, 0);
  console.log(`Capacity: ${capacity}, total weight: ${totalWeight}`);
  console.log(`Scores: ${scores} - Weights: ${weights}`);
  if (capacity >= totalWeight) return totalScore; 
}

A lot of tests where capacity is greater than the sum of all weights are failing.

I have the same problem. My solution passed all sample tests but failed random tests. One of many examples:
s: [ 17, 18, 9, 10, 20, 2 ]
w: [ 2, 4, 1, 5, 1, 1 ]
c: 50
Expected: 111, instead got: 76

JS :

• asserts changed
• check for new array added (killed all? solutions)
• random tests were added (see above)

.

Depends on what you consider the JS equivalent of a Ruby hash.

The way it's written, an Array is not, but a Date or a RegExp is. A primitive ( boolean, string, number, null, undefined ) should not be; that's obvious.

If you consider an Object to be an object, everything but a primitive should be, including a Boolean, String or Number ( /= boolean, string, number ).

The best JS implementation of this idea may not be a faithful adaptation of the original ( and the best implementation including Ruby may not be to return the same object modified ).