There can be some confusion between different authors, whether to include/index the 0 term in the Fibonacci sequence (whether fib(0) = 1 or fib(0) = 0). See this stackoverflow post for example

117669030460994 is therefore either fib(69) or fib(70) - if your code can produce this number, all you need to do therefore is change the indexing by one (for example, if given input n use your code to calculate fib(n-1)) as this kata uses: fib(0) = 0, fib(1) = 1, fib(2) = 1, fib(3) = 2 etc.