I've added more variety of depth in the fixed test cases now. Is it enough or should I add more?

Examples and sample/fixed tests have a fixed depth (all arrays contains only numbers or only subarrays), but in random tests there are arrays with both numbers and subarrays.

Either use only fixed depth in random tests or add examples and fixed tests with multi-depth inputs.

my beau-tiful solution :(

Fixed it, shouldn't work now.

calm down man

You should read this carefully: https://docs.codewars.com/authoring/guidelines/kata

Also how is it a duplicate? All I see is stuff like who won and extended rules. I don't see anything about what beats what

About the duplicate, I can't do anything about it

but about the error situation I made it so that it generates random strings like 'x0GnN' and 'LpJr8'

hi,

unfortunately, that's a duplicate: https://www.codewars.com/kata/search/my-languages?q=rock%20paper

if you are interested in authoring, you should read the documentation about it before, to spare you this kind of situation.

about the tests, they are okayish but the error situation in the random test should be triggered by something more "random" (not always the same input, I mean)

cheers

Even the example solution fails this test. :/

• No random tests
• Trivial regexp replace is not a novel idea either

Oh S h I  T I F u C k ed up

expected 'Oh shoot I fudge ed up' to equal 'Oh shoot I fudgeed up'

Why is the whitespace after k removed? It's certainly not in between.

TypeError: assert.Equal is not a function
    at Context.<anonymous> (test.js:13:12)
    at processImmediate (internal/timers.js:461:21)

Well... this is the actual point. There are already lots of approved katas with this particular idea, so there is no point for new similar katas. Don't be disappointed, you may do some better research and come back later with a more interesting idea.

How is https://www.codewars.com/kata/57ee4a67108d3fd9eb0000e7 an approved kata?