just delete line 2

hice ese , veo otros que se ven muy bien pero trato de ejecutarlos en mi id y todos sueltan error, por el momento me quedo copn la interacion

It needs to be done manually, done.

solutions that do not pass the current tests - should be removed or marked as outdated. Maybe.

Yes. Read all the other comments.
The kata had a "bug" back then.

This would fail the current set of unit tests.

Because the kata was changed after this was made. See the comments below.

I failed this solution because of overflow!

sounds good. but 7 days delay...

warning, expected and actual are inverted in the testBasic methods

Fixed.

the length of the random inputs should be random too.

Done

seems you made the description language frree? Maybe remove the name of the function too? (because snake,camel,pascal,whatever...)?

It was language-neutral before I added random tests, and I would like to believe that users would figure out the correct name for their lnaguage, but I removed th function name form the description nonetheless. Let me know if it's ok now.

unnamed suggested a test with an empty array. Could be good to add it too.

No language version I checked tests for empty arrays, and it's not mentioned in the description either. I did not introduce such test to keep things consistent between languages.

• warning, expected and actual are inverted in the testBasic methods
• the length of the random inputs should be random too.
• seems you made the description language frree? Maybe remove the name of the function too? (because snake,camel,pascal,whatever...)?
• unnamed suggested a test with an empty array. Could be good to add it too.

More tests needed, including an empty array test and preferably random tests.

... Read comments below.

Also see (and upvote) this issue report: https://www.codewars.com/kata/5324945e2ece5e1f32000370/discuss#57ab495972292d35480001c7

The new test cases showed this solution with overflow error and number format error