First rule of Regular Expressions - if have more simple use string method, then use more simple method than regular expressions =^)

for me its not readable at all ! xD

So THAT'S how to squeeze it onto one line! Niiiice :-)

Even though it's asking to rewrite the code, this is easier to understand, uses fewer lines of code and is simpler. In my opinion, this is a perfect solution since it teaches you what is most efficient instead of just doing what the problem asks.

I knew someone would have it done concisely on one line; nice!

the task was not to rewrite the function but to fix it

I didn't realize that was an option, I really like the way you can chain those

This is clever, but not so intuitive in my opinion.
But I'm just getting started with Python and programming in general, so I might change my opinion further down the rabbit hole!

yes, this kata only asked to fix the bug in the code. not rewrite the entire code.

Hello,
from what I understand, if (number % a > 0 or number % b > 0) it will return False because then that is some value.
number % a here is equals to number % a > 0.
so, the program returns True if number % a and number % b DO NOT have any values( because then they are of value 0 )

this is literally not the purpose of this ex I guess

Again?