can't we ask a chatbot to find the original kata? o_0

actually no, but I'm pretty sure it exists

can't recall the duplicate kata for the original description, have a link?

it's a duplicate eithe way, soooooo....

if the ref solution would fit the original description, it could have been an interesting kata ... instead of changing the ref solution, user opted to change description -> kata should not be republished in my opinion -> trivial kata

'beg you pardon? How a description describing the wrong task could make the kata "interesting"?

oh too bad, you had a nice kata, now you will make this into an uninteresting one

oh ok i think i have to change the description. thanks for your help

no:

A subsequence is a sequence that can be derived from the original sequence by deleting some or no elements without changing the order of the remaining elements

[1, 2, 3, 6, 4, 5] -> [1, 2, 3, x, 4, 5] => 5

If your solution expects something else, that means either the description or the code is wrong.

The longest strictly increasing subsequence of [1, 2, 3, 6, 4, 5] is [1, 2, 3, 6] whose length is 4
As for being a duplicate I checked most of the auto generated duplicates so i dont think so but please tell me if it is

yes i think i might have to recheck. Thanks for your comment as this is my first kata

Hi,

([1, 2, 3, 6, 4, 5]) -> 4

no, 5, according to the description.

Are you SURE this isn't a duplicate? (I'm pretty usre it is...)

Cheers