i suppose code that isn't best practice is often marked as clever here
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
Can u explain this more indeep?
ight bro
@kristynagel72 It does not return 0 because he adds 1 to the recursive call every time.
Why shouldn't we alter the function definition if it makes sense? Their solution is much more readable than yours thanks to default arguments.
I'd cuddle this code
Why does it not return 0 everytime, then?
Enabled, so closing.
Could you please tell why the absence of Python 3.6.0 version is an issue?
Loading collection data...
i suppose code that isn't best practice is often marked as clever here
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
Can u explain this more indeep?
ight bro
@kristynagel72 It does not return 0 because he adds 1 to the recursive call every time.
Why shouldn't we alter the function definition if it makes sense?
Their solution is much more readable than yours thanks to default arguments.
I'd cuddle this code
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
Why does it not return 0 everytime, then?
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
Enabled, so closing.
Could you please tell why the absence of Python 3.6.0 version is an issue?
Loading more items...