Done. If you have any proposals, let me know please

on the n position (the second argument, only positive integer)
...
P.S. If n < 0, return false

A positive integer is never < 0...

Hi, adrian.eyre. Could you reopen your translation of "Whose bicycle?" kata? The system didn't allow me do it becuase of recent changes in that kata.

So if we have any character on negative position, we should return false.

Hi, guys. I've fixed it.

Description says positive integer. Nonetheless, there is a positive ("E") at position for the example I gave, but it expects false, so the test fails. Happens 9 times (with my code). Most tests pass, though. Thanks.

I mean, when you have vowel in negative position in your test it "false"

This isnt a bug, its a standard feature in Ruby :-)

Are you coding in Ruby? If so be aware of negative numbers when used in string positions :-)

Spec was copied from the original Javascript version. @Linis222 do you want me to update random tests or are you updating the description. Currently the tests expect to have false returned anything less than 0

Ruby random tests use negative indices but it's not specified what should be returned in this case.

You have a bug in test system. In Ruby you can use negative index to count from end of array.

Hi, could you share your solution to help you?