thank you, i thought it was a Martingale ...

It's a little bit confusing when in description we have rounds as an argument and in function we see losses (but author add this in decription: "This consistently results in me losing [...]"). After all I think the idea is not so complicated to demand example tests in description, but everyone has an opinion.

Losses - number of played rounds ("This consistently results in me losing [...]"), so all rounds were lost :)

I don't understand what we're supposed to be doing here.. My understanding is laid out below:

1. You take the initial wager amount, and then lose (loss #1)
2. You then double it, and then lose (loss #2), and repeat this step for the number of times in the losses argument.

So for a cash = 11, wager = 2, and losses = 3, you'd expect to lose 2 on the first round, 4 on the second, and 8 on the third, which is a total wager of 14. Because that's more than the amount of cash that you have, you can't pay up and have to pay later. This is obviously not what the program wants... so how should I be understanding it?

i do not understand this (cash, wager, losses) .. what do you mean by losses? the amounth of times they bet?