Ad
  • Custom User Avatar

    This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

  • Custom User Avatar

    I would, no offense. The description of the problem leaves much to be desired anyways. What's next should we call the fibonacci series as "a collection of numbers where a number is the sum of the previous two" so that its harder for people to research if they don't know about its existence. I can hardly understand how the function should be written without looking at the tests and rereading the description 3 times. There are ways to write a description which makes things interesting without holding the person's hand.

    Edit: To clarify I really don't mind googling as much as some here in the comments, that's how I have learned anything especially regarding programming or pen testing, but give better hints. Otherwise it was quite a fun kata.

  • Custom User Avatar

    Get-It : The term 'Get-It' is not recognized as the name of a Sarcasm-function, script file, or operable program.
    Check the spelling of the name, or if a path was included, verify that the path is correct and try again.
    At line:1 char:1

    • Get-It
    •   + CategoryInfo          : ObjectNotFound: (Get-It:String) [], CommandNotFoundException
        + FullyQualifiedErrorId : CommandNotFoundException
      
  • Custom User Avatar

    Boring day at work hey? xD

  • Custom User Avatar

    This comment has been deleted.

  • Custom User Avatar

    This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

  • Custom User Avatar

    This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

  • Custom User Avatar

    This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution