This code is more like english

It's bad practice to remove them. It's relying on the tests to include them instead, which leaves these solutions prone to being automatically invalidated in the future if the tests change and their solutions don't compile anymore. The line or two saved by omitting them isn't worth that risk, so you're doing good by keeping them in

why theres no #include
i tried it without the lib but dosnt work for me

Very readable and logical. Oh, this language design...

where did 'const' go?

Oh, yes... I see...

but the return value will be retuned as an integer. it won't convert to a char. that's not what you want the function to do

Yeah

Since the return value of the function is char, you can simply replace char(i) with i.

I was using /n instead of \n and got confused for a good 5 minutes, fml

I had a feeling that I said something like this in my head, but was unaware that it would work as kata.
Good job.

xD

Whilst this solution does pass the test it has changed the parameter from a const. This would be considered bad practice as it edits the original value.

had a spasm reading this.

nice catch, didn't see it at first not gonna lie.