Nice kata wejungle! Micro suggestion: In example 1, under results, there should be single quotes around .mp3

Great kata, I learned so much and am grateful. But WOW it took so. much. time.

Anyone that gets this done in under 3 hours deserves a trophy! :)

Something like:

"The number of rotations required is one less than the length of the given number. The example above is five digits long, so it requires four roatations. 1234567 is seven digits long, so it would require six rotations."

Thanks again for your commitment to creating and improving katas.

The description only says to rotate four times, it doesn't say to continue the pattern over the lenght of the number no matter how long. Please consider updating the instructions for those of us that take insturctions very literally. :) Other than that, nice kata.

DAAAMN... that was a journey! A great journey. Thank you for the excellent kata!!

HELL YEAH!! I got it! THANK YOU FOR THE EXCELLENT KATA!

I take it all back. Doing this kata in an OOP way has been fun and educational.

On another note, getting past the random test is DAMN HARD (no success yet). A well designed test, for sure.

I'm learning OOP right now and what you say makes sense. Perhaps this is a great kata for me to practice on (I did the other battleship one last night).

With respect and in a nice tone - the initial setup of the kata says //your code here! which kinda sorta implies that is the only place code should be added, which for me, is confusing.

**I just re-read my initial post and did not mean to sound so harsh. I should have coffee before posting. :)

Ok, I'm open to learning new things. How do I get the BF object to work inside of the validate method? I'm unfamiliar with this setup and would very much like to learn.

public BF(int[][] field) {}
  
 public boolean validate() {
      BF myBF = ???
      System.out.println(myBF[1][1]);
      return false;
}

Please set up your java translation like all of the others on Codewars. BF(field).validate() is a hurdle that doesn't need to be jumped.

Thanks @g964 for the fun and educational kata.

I had a similar issue as above, but have not mutated the input. *Correction: yes I did mutate the input.

It sort of looks like you mashed your hands on the keypad, got lucky, then passed the kata.

But seriously, that is bad ass. Nice job.

Thank you for the excellent reply. I will do all of those things.

Why doesn't my line 'name is None' handle this issue then?

It tests to see if nothing is passed into the function.

I am trying to learn, not just trying to be a wise guy.