This is hilarious.

Probably not

Parsing "((cao.z)(b|q))": expected:<((cao.z)(b|q))> but was:<(cao.z(b|q))>

This two answers have same RPN, so its impossible to do with RPN

Is it even possible to do with reverse polish notation? Am stuck with the parenthesis problem (abc) != ((ab)c)

as the greatest always say: " boolean lol"

I did it using the construction of a bijection between five-digit numbers and codes, it turned out that everything could be done much easier)

wtf can somebody explain how it works?))

Ilon Mask?

This is horrible but i find it funny that it works so in a sense its correct I guess xd

LOL. if it works, it works

And what if it's type become something more than a long?

it is a smart solution tho

no disrespect but wtf is this?

You don't. As far as long is concerned number 2971215073L suffice.

If pre-computing numbers, why not to pre-compute products? We need to go deeper...

What if you needed way more fibo numbers ^^ ? like the first 100?