There seems to be an issue with the test: I was working on my algorithm, trying out a modification and suddenly I had "passed" the tests - only that there were only 2 of them that had run, and very basic ones... Not sure what causes this on the back end, though. The only thing that I could think of is an "exit()" statement in my code, that I was using for debuggin.

Why not make '.#' instead of [True, False]?

JS translation

python new test frameworks

This is a C challenge, but I don't believe it's possible purely in C, for x64 - is it?

Since the first six arguments in SYS-V ABI are passed in registers rdi, rsi, rdx, rcx, r8, r9 and not on the stack, there's no real way to get them without using __asm or other non-C mechanisms perhaps.

I can find some arguments on the stack by abusing*,&. However, some arguments don't appear to be available without using __asm to try and extract it from registers directly. I could however be wrong. I do see n on the stack, which also confuses me as I would think it would only be in RDI, but past that I don't see anything until argument six of the variadic part. Am I wrong or is the challenge? Is it supposed to be solved with __asm?

As a grandpa dev, I don't know sh... about Python...
And like this kind of puzzles... (see 'pentomino').
Can you make it C++ without me to forfeit ?

python new test framework is required. updated in this fork

In the initial solution perimeter is misspelled as perimenter in the definition of the struct shape_vtable_t.

typedef struct _shape_vtable_t {
  double (*get_area)();
  double (*get_perimenter)();
  void (*destroy)();
} shape_vtable_t;

I solved this problem and got points but couple of days later they were gone.
does anyone know why?

Rust translation

Anticheat test is crashing on accepted solutions.