Loading collection data...
Collections are a way for you to organize kata so that you can create your own training routines. Every collection you create is public and automatically sharable with other warriors. After you have added a few kata to a collection you and others can train on the kata contained within the collection.
Get started now by creating a new collection.
best solution
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
I edited it, it should be set to C++17 now
Unfortunately, one of CW bugs got triggered and your fork is published as using C++14 version, instead of C++17. Could you try to edit it, change the version of the language, and republish? And if this does not help, then re-fork it, and publish with a changed language version?
C++ translation published
approved
C++ translation published
C++ translation published
This fork should fix the issue
After verification, the C++ test suite is definitely broken. This is an example of input for the medium tests in C++ :
{3,6,3,5,7,3,5,8,6,10,5,7,6,5,7,7,7,3,1,8,3,3,6,1,6,10,8,5,7,2,10,1,8,4,5,6,8,9,5,5,1,10,1,6,4,7,4,2,2,5,9,4,9,6,6,5,5,5,9,1,7,10,3,6,3,8,1,10,8,6,4,8,5,4,6,10,3,9,1,4,3,1,9,2,7,7,8,3,1,6,4,9,5,8,4,9,5,7,8,5,2,3,2,8,8,7,9,10,6,9,5,10,1,4,3,7,10,10,10,2,5,5,1,1,2,6,1,9,2,8,3,5,2,4,2,10,3,10,1,10,10,8,9,1,1,2,9,2,1,8,5,8,4,7,10,6,3,1,6,6,10,8,1,2,1,4,3,5,6,5,4,5,2,5,7,4,6,6,7,8,5,2,7,9,8,7,6,2,9,1,8,10,8,10,3,10,5,5,7,10,2,10,7,3,4,3,9,1,10,5,1,5,6,7,5,6,5,10,9,5,2,8,5,9,7,7,10,2,4,6,3,5,8,9,9,3,4,9,4,5,4,6,1,1,4,5,8,9,6,7,5,7,4,9,7,3,8,7,6,1,4,8,7,3,9,7,6,4,6,1,10,9,6,1,1,9,5,9,9,1,7,4,9,10,4,6,4,1,4,9,1,9,9,7,2,7,4,7,2,1,7,1,9,4,1,9,2,8,9,3,8,5,6,6,7,9,3,10,2,6,9,2,5,7,1,6,5,6,4,6,6,2,6,6,5,9,6,8,6,5,10,5,9,7,2,5,8,5,7,9,2,5,2,8,3,2,3,7,9,8,2,6,9,9,1,3,9,7,3,4,3,4,8,3,1,2,10,8,6,6,8,7,10,9,5,2,3,9,10,1,9,1,7,7,1,9,2,10,7,4,3,9,7,3,4,9,4,3,8,1,8,5,9,9,4,5,2,6,6,1,8,4,3,6,10,3,5,1,4,3,6,9,4,5,1,7,3,6,9,1,8,8,5,6,6,10,1,7,7,6,9,5,1,1,2,10,5,8,3,9,1,8,7,4,4,9,10,7,6,10,7,3,7,3,8,4,3,10,10,9,7,10,5,7,10,7,7,6,6,1,4,6,10,2,1,4,10,2,10,5}
and the correct output (computed with the Python reference solution) is
9189219707931193199459304195173016683771551867906074348090583697662521149392759681823894170077096644424564514318051866413296335691814331382722620500757801464266905719107348148032214941363160214553271053804378298390939293712808946127253452553014633676202571044656910855336273969534459600000
which is far too big for an
unsigned long long
to hold.This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
I'm encountering the same problem. My C++ solution overflows on medium and large tests, but passes all tests when rewritten in Python (so the algorithm it uses is likely correct). The intermediate values it manipulates are smaller than the total result, which would indicate that the expected result for medium and large tests does not fit in 64-bit integers, and that the reference C++ solution either overflows or does modular arithmetic over an unspecified constant
I've merged the descriptions in this fork. Are there any other changes I should make that I missed ?
The solution still needs to be merged with some more recent changes.
Loading more items...