Loading collection data...
Collections are a way for you to organize kata so that you can create your own training routines. Every collection you create is public and automatically sharable with other warriors. After you have added a few kata to a collection you and others can train on the kata contained within the collection.
Get started now by creating a new collection.
yes please
i can't for the life of me figure out why my test are working but my attempt isn't
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
Yes, i actually uploaded my solution without caring about the initial position, it's not necessary
Now you have to return false.
Thanks for the edit :D
Now it's also Python 3 compatible. Regards, suic
Both the intruction and the tests seem to ignore init_pos.
As far as I can tell, this has still not been fixed.
The description also needs a more complete, comprehensive description of the input validation required for the level parameter in the Game class. For example, I was not expecting boolean values, let alone know what to do with a value of "true": Should I treat it as 1, or as 0 because it's not an integer? This had to be disccovered in the test data and results.
$word_list for Ruby(fixed), then as it says WORD_LIST for Python and wordList for javascript
You were provided with a list of 2000 words of the Oxford Dictionary Of English (U.K. English), named WORD_LIST for python, word_list for ruby, wordList for javascript.
WORD_LIST or word_list or wordList.
Hi, yes... now it's much quicker, just submited a short solution without "memo..." (~2.5 sec to more than 6 before). So thanks and well done;-)!
PS: Now three solutions, hard work your kata:-)!
@CrazyMerlyn
Thanks : )
@smile67
I've just updated the test, could you please check if it runs faster now.
Thanks
See filter in Python documentation :)
The correct answer to this problem is
ans = 73199199341
. Even if m and n are not coprime, there may be a solution. You can verify the solution by(ans + a) % m == 0
and(ans + b) % n == 0
.PS: Maybe this timeout is a "new problem" of your random testcases? Always timeout here, but my code seems for me ok...
Loading more items...