This is an issue.

(By the way, your proposed compareObjects is bug-ridden.)

Cool

It's an old one. Random tests were not yet a big thing in 2014.

Tests are now locked, so there will not be random tests.

Closing.

There are already 500 solves so this can't be done anymore. Sad but closing.

.

We need competent powerful users to add random tests to this kata in these languages:

• Javascript
• CoffeeScript
• Ruby

Fixed

@CursedFlames @Abbe translated it to JavaScript :)

agree!

Many thanks for your work - well done:-)! It's approved;-)!

OK, I have added the random tests exactly as you suggested, including your (much more efficient) solution. Thanks again for your help with this! I'll mark the issue as resolved, but please let me know if anything still doesn't look right.

Thanks for your feedback. The instruction to round to two decimal places was already in the description, however.

As for your test code, I understand having to change the statement with Math.random to fit the range of values in my description, but what about the numbers in the first line of the function? Can I use the numbers in your example code, or must these also be changed to fit my kata?

I will read the guide that you mentioned. Thank you for linking to it!

This kata uses heavy meta-programming which Ruby is known for. JS could maybe do it using ES6 Proxies. Elixir might be another language that could pull this off.

It looks good to me. Thank you!