Loading collection data...
Collections are a way for you to organize kata so that you can create your own training routines. Every collection you create is public and automatically sharable with other warriors. After you have added a few kata to a collection you and others can train on the kata contained within the collection.
Get started now by creating a new collection.
keep getting "unknown error" or memory error from large number input
f(83065750, 36664444)
83065750.0 36664444.0
Traceback:
in
in f
MemoryError
It seems either one of the test case isn't correct or I don't understand the problem
['s', 'e', 'w', 'n', 'n', 'e', 's', 'w']
True should equal False <---- this is the error message I got
I passed all tests, but it gave me error messege listed below. It doesn't seem to be from a new test, since I print out input at the start of the program, and I don't see any new input printing out after the last "Test Passed"
The las test I passed was "{[{}[]{}{}{}{}{}{}()()()()()()()()]{{{[[[((()))]]]}}}}(())[[]]{{}}[][][][][][]"
Traceback:
in
in group_check
IndexError: list index out of range
I like the problem,it's cool. I think my code works, tested it with upto 100k in my pc
but, everytime I submitted, "Process was terminated. It took longer than 6000ms to complete"
compute-intensive problem such as finding fib number or prime, if you put up too large a number for the test, the server may not be able to handle it within a reasonable time frame.
I tested
but still failed a test for getting a 0 in the result chain
In the test case, I got
259 [8, 7, 5, 3]--> 'Not applicable' should equal '-3--0--4--1-'
15 [8, 6, 5] -->'-7--3--0-' should equal 'Not applicable' (changed my code in here to allow 0 in the chain)
notice here, 259 % 7=0 and 15 % 5=0, looks contradictory to me
Is there any specific rule that's not in the problem description?
wouldn't ask if I could understand clearly what the question is asking, both 2 and 3 are prime factor of 12, and 3 and 5 of 15, but why put 3 with 27? simply because 3 is the prime factor of 27, which happens to be the sum of both? why not also put 3 in along with other two values, is it simply because 3 is the prime factor all 3 numbers have in common. what if I have 2 prime numbers that are factors of the sum of all initial values, do I put them with them sum? or there should only be one number with the sum? all those are not clear to me.
Having just one or two set of result data , it's offen not easy to tell what needs to be done.
just like your example,I = [15, 30, -45] 5 divides 15, 30 and (-45) so 5 appears in the result, the sum of the numbers for which 5 is a factor is 0 so we have [5, 0] in the result amongst others. obviously, 3 is a prime factor of all 3 numbers as 5, why it's not [3,5,0]? besides, 3 and 5 are not prime factors of 0.
'apples, pears \xc2\xa7 and bananas\ngrapes\navocado' should equal 'apples, pears\ngrapes\navocado'
\xc2\xa7 is "§"
I run it in my pc, with python 2.7, and got the result as required, but couldn't pass the test here, maybe a server side issue?
I tried a few different alogrithm,the methods includ direct calculation with loop from f2 to fn, using Binet's formula, using the matrix form, the fib(2n)s,fib(3n)s, all failed at Verifying that fib(-96) == -51680708854858323072, the answers from running here is different from what I get my pc, which gave correct value. must be something wrong on the server side
same issue here,hmm, my code passed all other testes, but it failed in Traceback, as you did, but nowhere in my code use map() function, list(),set(),yield are all I used
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution