not enough information :/
language ? nature of the bug ?

You need to check the length of the output string, not the component words in it, this will give output strings over 140 characters long for a sufficiently large input of small words.

How could this be "best practices"? 0_o

.

I might have found a weird bug in this kata, probably it needs more tests to avoid rigged solutions.

Good:\n
Clean code and Readibilty are crying in nano(If you know what it means then accept it, vim is superior)

Guido would hate you :)

funny

really?
well it works i guess

who in the world voted this for best practices?

Probably. Then there should be more tests, in order folks like myself would have to rethink work arounds.

Your code is wrong, it returns a wrong result when there is more than one missing number.

Your task is to find the first element of an array that is not consecutive.

Random weirdness with 6 instead of 16 in PYTHON! Well, there is always a way around it, with a separate "if" condition for that case

Make sure you understand what this means : "If limit is a multiple of integer" this is the catch!