Approved

Needs restrictions tag.

Fork implementing these just in case this is ever approved lol:

https://www.codewars.com/kumite/66848553977c442b381e2040

Suggestions:

• Freeze String.prototype to prevent solutions such as this
• Set d01.toString = Function.prototype.toString to prevent solutions such as this

marking as resolved plenty of new tests, including random added since that by someone.

marking as resolved - random tests added by someone.

The order of keys is the same order of array in input

Objects do not have key order in general.

and the order of alerts is left to rigth top to bottom

This is not properly tested: sorting by y first or x first both passes the tests.

Also this description is not properly formatted at all (and not even coherent in the first place), it screams to be rewritten.

Distance metric is not specified, and frankly insane: why is Chebyshev distance used??? Shouldn't any sane person be able to deduce that distances in reality are in Euclidean distance?

My solution passed without any problem and is using lambda.
Seems that the problem was fixed.

Fixed

"Can't use Operator >" when using lambda functions (this problem is so simple that I'm trying to golf it).