After 2 years you still did not update

Huh? Kata description says this:

The radar can also see into nearby buildings

After 2 years you still did not update and made me waste lots of time >:(

I mean, if I want to know if there's a burglar in my house, it's useless to view the camera images of my neighour's house

OK. That is a valid point.

I have updated the Kata description. Thanks for the feedback.

Well you don't have to mention that there is more than one building in the world, but it would be helpfull to know there is more than one building in the radar image. From the details this is not clear, and it's not logical either. I mean, if I want to know if there's a burglar in my house, it's useless to view the camera images of my neighour's house. So why should Potus be looking at all the buidlings in the world, if he wants to know whether he's alone in the White House? The programming solution can be quite different for one house than it is for two or more houses. So to avoid disappointment of future candidates, you could consider mentioning this fact or add a test case from which this is clear.

You already know that:

• Potus is in the White House.
• The White house is a building.

Nothing changes there.

Do you really think it is necessary to say there may be more than one building in the whole world?

The details of this Kata talk about Potus begin in the White Houuse (single building). During the tests, it appeared that Potus can be in one building and an elf in another building (so two buildings). This drove me to a complete differenct approach for the solution. Suggestion: Update the details and mention the fact that there can be multiple buildings.

From the solutions I learn that an empty array is considered an onion array. This souds strange to me. Also arrays with an even number of elements are considered valid onion arrays whilst the tests/examples only show arrays with an odd nunmber of elements.

To me this solution (and others alike) are the best. They are the only ones that cover the following case:
"10 shots and 2 beer". Most solutions give 3 (1 + 0 + 2) instead of 12 (10 + 2) as the result.

This solution doesn't cover the following case:
"10 shots and 2 beer". The result is 3 (1 + 0 + 2) instead of 12 (10 + 2).

This solution doesn't cover the following case:
"10 shots and 2 beer". The result is 3 (1 + 0 + 2) instead of 12 (10 + 2).