Decided to forgo length = 0 as like you said it does not completely makes sense and asking users to raise exception probably would only distract people from the main task. length > 0 now.
By the way, thank you both for the feed back, appreciate it. I'm learning a lot :)

Accidental double comment

Yeah, I get what you mean now. But I still want users to check for when length = 0, so I should probably reword kata somehow. Or do you think it should return False in this case instead?

Not sure. I think that given length = 0 returning 0 hooks is okay. Or are you saying thatlength = 0 should not be given as it implies that there is no curtain to begin with?

So probably int() is just not needed then. I see why it might be confusing.

This solution seems to always return False if maxHook >= 2*length. Try test.assert_equals(number_of_hooks(25,50), 2) Cought that on a corrected kata random test case

Changed the code, I believe it's resolved now

Resolved

Yeah my bad, L < D should return 2, outthough myself on that one.
As for L=0 meaning no curtain needs to be hanged, 0 seems like a reasonable answer for the number of hooks required. At the same time maybe None is more appropriate?

I could think of more inefficient ways to do this (and tried one way that fails big number test) so I though mine was prety good (lack of programming knowledge), but you are right after looking at your solution I get what you mean :D. Will think about how to either reword or improve the solution. Or maybe this wording works for the "good enough" solutions.