I feel like it is. Yes, formal parameters are described in camelCase in the description, but why is it an issue ? You have to name them somehow for the problem statement

done

fixed

approved

OCaml translation

Function name typo

Function names misspelled in both.

• the target point is not always the bottom right corner. it cannot be changed now with 4 languages and 400+ completions
• unfortunately, kata ranks cannot be changed post-approval

In the above example the minimum path would be:

although it can be deduced, it should be mentioned that this is the minimum path to reach the bottom right. It is important, since we are provided with a target point and it is not always the bottom right.

if n%2 is 0 it becomes false means it will use 8, and anything other than 0 is true.

if the condition of ternary operator isn't Boolean type, maybe JS convert the condition to Boolean type first,and 0 to Boolean type is false, other number is true.

Can someone tell me why he is not comparing to zero?
I mean, I really love this solution but i dont get it at all

description should be language-agnostic.

python new test framewprks

fds?