the error comes from your code, and the output panel gives you enough information to find out what's wrong.

If I just disregard the spaghetti code given to us, I'm able to solve it :)

fixed in latest fork.

Wow. This is beyond ridiculous. CW users doing vote witch-hunting as usual. What's next? Revealing who voted what and then shame on people for not voting the average?

I'm ashamed of all of you. Votes are anonymous for a good reason; the way voting system is supposed to work is to gather enough votes that the average sort of represents what most people think is true.

Unmasking individual votes and write a massive rant bitching about users not voting according to your norm is equivalent to doxxing online users who don't agree with you. You are the one who should be banned.

XML specs exist. The problem is the author clearly has no idea of the XML spec, because invalid XMLs are all over the place.

The error appears to persist if the code length is higher than allowed.

I get "ReferenceError: process is not defined" in real tests

Of which kata?

Why you think that examples doesn;t make sense ?

Issue not producible by now, closing

I should have prepared the Js version with BigInt.

@ZED.CWT convinced me to remove the hints a few moments after publishing the kata.( 4 years ago )

I can only find some upperbound estimators. This kata is beyond me.

Yes, you must remove duplicates. It is in the description but the sentence seems badly worded. Will be fixed soon.

approved